PROTECTING PHYSICIANS FIRST, AND PATIENTS FOREMOST
-- AMS has 501c3 status (tax exempt) -- YOUR PARTICIPATION/DONATION HELPS EDUCATEAnnouncement
Strategic Educational Partners
SHAM PEER REVIEW
EXPERTS IN DOCTOR PEER REVIEW HELP! THE CENTER FOR PEER REVIEW JUSTICE: www.PeerReview.org www.PeerReviewSolutions.org SHAM PEER REVIEWPages
- About The Founder of America’s Medical Society
- Contact
- Donate
- Forum
- Gallery
- Links
- Log In
- MEDIA Inquiries
- News
- PHONE (24/7): 202-423-3366
- Portfolio
- Products
- Services
- SHAM PEER REVIEW DEFENSE
- Terms of Use
- Testimonials
- TESTIMONIALS
- Understanding Medical Student Loans
- WASHINGTON, D.C. EDUCATION PAGE ~ the AMS ‘Physicians’ Rights Mission’
- WOUNDED WARRIORS/AMS 2nd Annual Freedom Run San Diego ~ 2012
- Membership
Log In
Most Recent Posts
- Doctors’ groups find comfort in numbers and organization against Obamacare
- A NEW BLUEPRINT FOR MEDICAL SYSTEM REFORM BEING WRITTEN IN SAN DIEGO
- National Doctors’ Coalition Event in San Diego May 5th/6th Shaping Up …
- Supreme musings on Obamacare
- Samuel Shem’s House of God 2012: Healthcare failures hiding behind paper
- EARLY BIRD REGISTRATION FOR DOCTORS COALITION MEETING ON MAY 5TH, 2012 (EVENING) AND MAY 6TH, 2012 (ALL DAY) IN SAN DIEGO
- Drug stores lack transparency; evidence-based medicine in doubt under Obamacare
- The Scheme to Change Your Doctor’s Prescription–A Glimpse of Obamacare or Just Unethical Profiteering?
- Obamacare and government intrusion into the practice of medicine; why California healthcare Bill AB 369 matters
- Physician Groups Step Out From the AMA’s Shadow — The Doctor’s Blueprint For Healthcare Reform (Spokesperson Rick Amato to Moderate Coalition Meeting in San Diego)
- RICK AMATO -- THE OFFICIAL AMS SPOKESPERSON www.AmatoTalk.com
Bill Gunderson www.pwstreet.com
www.mpicharitable.com
Masterpiece Investments Corp.: a partner with America's Medical Society to help educate physicians and the public ... www.mpicharitable.com
Subscribe to our newsletter!
When we introduce our Newsletter, do you wish to be automatically subscribed? Sign up here! (AMS does NOT send SPAM; you may Opt OUT at any time.) -- AMS has 501c3 status (tax exempt) -- YOUR PARTICIPATION/DONATION HELPS EDUCATEAMS ‘White Paper’ on the 2011 JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE for Budget Reduction
America’s Medical Society, Inc. 03 NOV 2011 Position Paper on the U.S. Deficit Reduction Super Committee (The Intersection of Economic Limitations, Fiscal Choices, and Patient Care) The Budget Control Act of 2011 established a bipartisan Super Committee of 12 members of Congresswho are tasked with identifying $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction for the next decade; the deadline for identifying areas to ‘reduce’ was set as“November 2011.” December 23rd, 2011 is the date that Congress is poised to pass legislation incorporating these recommendations. The time for making hard choices is fast approaching. If the committee fails to implement such a plan, as much as 1.2 trillion in across-the-board cuts, evenly divided between defense and non-defense sectors, will be imposed. The Joint Select Committee could propose cuts that would reduce spending in Medicare and/or restrict Medicare benefits; these changes will likely have a significant impact on patient care services, co-pays, prescription drugs, and physician/provider reimbursement. There is much ongoing debate about the ‘Affordable Care Act’ (PPACA), but by any estimation our nation is facing the imperative to provide increased medical services to millions of more Americans in the next decade alone. The Board of America’s Medical Society (AMS) believes it stands with the majority of laypersons and healthcare professionals alike when it asks ‘canMedicare truly afford to cut benefits and pay to doctors and other medical providers and expect the access to that care to remain unchanged?’We believe the answer to that question is unequivocally ‘no’. Medicare is a national healthcare safety net for America’s elderly and disabled; Medicare Part D, also known as the Medicare Prescription Drug Plan, was created under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (2003 Medicare Act) to help cover the costs of prescription drugs for patients and seniors. Thanks to competition among plans and strong cost controls, Medicare Part D works. Free market competition in Part D drives drug costs down; likewise, potential reforms that would act to stifle that competition will inflate seniors’ premiums, quash R&D and cut tens of thousands of skilled, high-paying American jobs. Since its creation, nearly 900,000 patients have used Part D discounts to save $461 million. Part D plans are also negotiating medicine rebates for millions of patients. According to the Medicare Trustees, rebates are 20-30 percent on many brand name drugs, with biopharmaceutical companies providing a 50 percent discount on brand name drugs in the Part D coverage ‘gap’. The AMS Position on Cuts to Healthcare and Medicare Part D: America’s Medical Society strongly urges Congress and the new ‘Joint Select Committee’ to preserve Medicare Part D, and to resist the urge to curtail the robust American free-market health care system. Any spending cuts that artificially restrict one of our unique national strengths—free-market competition and innovation—will negatively affect our national value, our competitive edge worldwide, and the long-term benefits of private sector research and development. Medicare Part D is a good example of a government safety net which also preserves the positive input of private markets. Like the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), put in place by the PPACA legislation, the Congressional budgetary super committee could apply ill-advised payment cuts to doctors providing care to seniors. Some in positions of power are advocating for this very thing—a move that would jeopardize patient care and limit seniors’ choice on necessary treatments and medications. The super committee and the IPAB will have little-to-no accountability – with no oversight by the Federal courts, the Department of Health and Human Services or even Congress at large – and patients will not be able to question, challenge, or seek redress from their changes or recommendations once made. America’s Medical Society strongly urges the Joint Select Committee to resist the temptation to implement short term cuts to doctors and patients at a time when our nation is looking for viable ways to effect long-term improvements to an expanding health care delivery system. AMS, Inc.The Independent Physician©OUR WASHINGTON, D.C. OFFICE CONTACT
202-423-3366 PHONE
AMS Board of Directors:
Glenn Davison, M.D., Cardiology -- MO Adam F. Dorin, M.D., MBA, Anesthesiology -- CA; David Fishkin, D.C., MPH, Chiropractic Med -- MD Frederick Foss -- MN; Eric Nicholson, M.D., Ph.D., Psychiatry -- CT; Rade Pejic, M.D., General/Vascular Surgery -- IN; John J. Sacco, M.D., Anesthesiology -- NY; Robert L. Kimber, M.D., Orthopedic Surgeon -- GA; Leslie Gullahorn, M.D., Orthopedic Surgeon -- AZ; Damian Becker -- NY; Kalee Salvato, M.D., Resident/Post-Graduate; Robert A. Kornfeld, DPM -- NY Kelley Kruse -- LA; Richard B. Willner -- LA ... PHONE: 202-423-3366 FAX: 504-305-4852 FAX: 202-318-0063TESTIMONIALS
"Dear Sirs, I was referred to you by a long term Physician friend and admire what you are trying to do. The public unfortunately thinks the AMA, AAFP and the AARP somehow represent the beliefs and support the rights of Physicians. As we know nothing could be farther from the truth. All three have sold out to the commercial interests that bring in the most money to their organization...." --Dr Mark Holscher MD (full letter under the 'testimonials' tab)UserOnline


![MPI_LOGO[1]](http://americasmedicalsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/MPI_LOGO1-300x104.jpg)


![Dorin1-4in_press[1]](http://americasmedicalsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Dorin1-4in_press1-214x300.jpg)


Common Sense Healthcare New Year’s Resolutions:
A dose of common sense by Dr. Robert Kornfeld
It seems that the majority of people agree that the health care delivery system in this country is badly broken and in need of revamping. I must admit I am extremely dismayed at the huge numbers of people who point a quick finger at “money hungry” doctors as the main reason that the system is failing. Until you have run a medical practice and have paid the expenses necessary to run it, that opinion is baseless and dangerous.
While we can all agree that there are “bad apples” in every line of work, the “bad apples” in medicine simply are not the reason that we are in the crisis we find ourselves in. This is a gross over-simplification of a complex issue and one that is extraordinarily unfair to the dedicated physicians that serve the public. However, I will also say that physicians have every right to earn a great living and, just like everybody else in a capitalist system, deserve to be paid commensurate with their expertise, commitment and drive to succeed in their field.
Health insurance companies interfere in the practice of medicine by creating a standard of care that should be established by physicians themselves (but is now set by insurance companies!). This is the main reason why doctor/insurance company relations have become contentious and adversarial. Unfortunately, there has also been a rise in contentious and adversarial doctor/patient relations. This is an ever-increasing problem and one that exists for what I believe to be 2 main reasons. Firstly, the new managed care insurance format has conditioned patients to believe that they can avail themselves of all the health care services they need for the price of a co-pay. That means that they are not willing to pay more than their co-pay, even when the services they need are not covered by their plan. Instead of seeing the limitations in coverage that they are paying premiums for, what they choose to see is that their doctor is trying to charge them extra for services that they ‘deserve’.
The second reason that there is an ever increasing dysfunction in the doctor/patient relationship due to the decrease in available time that a doctor has to spend with his patients. The irony is that most patients will only go to doctors that accept their insurance. What they fail to realize is that doctors who participate with insurance companies get paid very little per patient encounter and therefore must see a large volume of patients to make ends meet. So the very reason why patients are choosing physicians is the very reason that they resent them. This is a lose/lose formula.
It seems that all discussions about “fixing” the system have to do with limiting fees paid to physicians, holding doctors accountable for expenditures (ACO’s) or re-defining the standard of care to include only those therapies dictated by insurance companies as acceptable and medically necessary (the catch-phrase for what they are willing to pay for…or not). Is it solely the responsibility of doctors, insurance companies and legislators to fix the system? I, for one, do not believe it is. Perhaps patients (i.e., the general public) share responsibility for fixing our medical delivery system.
So how can patients do their part? There are a number of things that are clearly the responsibility of patients:
From all of us at America’s Medical Society: May 2012 bring happiness and a successful, healthy New Years to you.
Share This